MCP vs A2A: Understanding the Two Protocols Powering the Agentic AI Era

Introduction

As AI systems move beyond simple prompt–response interactions, agents have become the dominant abstraction. Modern AI agents are expected to:

• Use tools and APIs
• Access private or enterprise data
• Collaborate with other agents
• Delegate tasks and reason over results

To make this possible at scale, standard protocols are emerging.

Two of the most important ones are:

• MCP (Model Context Protocol)
• A2A (Agent-to-Agent Protocol)

Although they are often mentioned together, they solve very different problems.
This article breaks them down from a system-design and engineering perspective, with concrete examples and diagrams.

---

What Is MCP (Model Context Protocol)?

Model Context Protocol (MCP) defines how an AI agent interacts with tools, data sources, and external systems.

In simpler terms:

MCP standardizes how one agent gets capabilities.

Problems MCP Solves

Before MCP, tool integration was:

• Ad-hoc
• Framework-specific
• Hard to reuse across agents and models

MCP introduces:

• A standard interface for tools
• Structured input/output schemas
• Clear separation between reasoning and execution

What MCP Enables

With MCP, an agent can:

• Query databases
• Call REST or internal APIs
• Read/write files
• Execute business workflows
• Access enterprise systems securely

All without hard-coding logic into the model itself.

---

MCP Architecture (High Level)

Key Characteristics

• Single-agent focused
• Tool access is explicit and typed
• Encourages safe and auditable execution
• Works well with enterprise environments

---

What Is A2A (Agent-to-Agent Protocol)?

A2A (Agent-to-Agent Protocol) standardizes communication between multiple autonomous agents.

In simple terms:

A2A standardizes how agents talk to other agents.

Problems A2A Solves

In multi-agent systems:

• Agents are built using different frameworks
• They may run in different environments
• Coordination logic becomes brittle

A2A introduces:

• A common messaging format
• Task delegation semantics
• Agent discovery and identity

---

A2A Architecture (High Level)

Key Characteristics

• Multi-agent focused
• Enables delegation and collaboration
• Framework-agnostic
• Designed for distributed systems

---

MCP vs A2A: Core Differences

---

Why MCP and A2A Are Not Competing

A common misconception is that MCP and A2A compete. In reality, they are orthogonal and complementary.

Mental Model

• MCP → What can this agent do?
• A2A → Who else can help me?

---

Using MCP and A2A Together (Realistic Architecture)

What’s Happening Here?

• A2A is used for delegation
• MCP is used for execution
• Each agent remains simple and focused

---

When Should You Use MCP?

Use MCP if:

• Your agent needs access to real systems
• You care about structured inputs/outputs
• You want tool reuse across models
• You’re building enterprise-grade agents

Typical examples:

• Backend automation
• DevOps agents
• Data analysis agents
• Internal productivity tools

---

When Should You Use A2A?

Use A2A if:

• Your system has multiple agents
• Tasks can be parallelized
• You want vendor/framework independence
• Coordination logic matters

Typical examples:

• Research assistants
• Planning + execution agents
• Autonomous workflow engines

---

Design Guidance (From Experience)

If you are starting out:

1. Start with MCP

   • One agent
   • Real tools
   • Clear value

2. Introduce A2A later

   • When workflows grow
   • When delegation improves clarity
   • When scale becomes a concern

Avoid building multi-agent systems just because—they add complexity quickly.

---

The Bigger Picture: Agentic AI Stack

Think of modern AI systems as layered:

User
 └── Agents (A2A)
       └── Tools & Data (MCP)
             └── Infrastructure

Each layer has a clear responsibility.

---

Final Thoughts

• MCP standardizes capabilities
• A2A standardizes collaboration
• Together, they form the backbone of production-ready agentic AI systems

If you’re serious about building AI agents beyond demos, understanding both is no longer optional.

---

Further Reading

• Agentic system design patterns
• Multi-agent orchestration strategies
• Secure tool execution for LLMs

---